You should know there's a new slj site! Check it out |
| |
|
Getting Real About Reconciliation A small-group case study at Cal Poly
| ||
|
|
by Todd Minturn, InterVarsity® campus staff
Do all chapters need to think about racial reconciliation? About gender issues? What if your campus is largely Caucasian?
These concerns led our chapter to start a small group dedicated to exploring issues of reconciliation and justice. It has been a challenge for me to plot the course and lead the way, but it has also been a joy, and so here I share the tack we’ve taken.
Begin at the beginning
“So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:27, NRSV). In making observations about God’s nature and character in Genesis, and our creation in passages like this, it was very significant for us to see that God is both plural and singular, and humanity is too. God is one and only one God, yet at the same time three distinct and equal persons. There are amazing implications that can be drawn for humans from this foundational aspect of the Trinity. First, God in three distinct and equal persons implies that these persons are in relationship with one another and that there is communication between them. Second, being one God in three persons implies that there is harmony and unity inherent in those relationships. Our group then asked what it means for us to be made in the image of God, which includes the elements of his character just discussed. Humankind is referred to in ways both plural and singular. If humankind consists of both male and female and bears the image of God, then it must take both male and female to constitute the fullness of that image. Humankind was also created for relationship and communication, just like God. If male and female together constitute one humanity, then this singularity means that the male and female were created for harmony and unity in their relationship just as God is in harmony and unity. While the Fall introduced deep brokenness into relationships between us and God and between male and female, it in no way changed God’s nature and character, nor did it change the fact that we are made in his image. As a result, God sought to restore the relationship and unity between him and us; he sought to reconcile us to himself. At the same time he desires male and female to be reconciled with each other, to restore the relationship, communication, harmony and unity we were created for. To fail to pursue reconciliation where there are broken relationships—whether racial or gender in nature—is a failure on our part to understand God’s character and deny the reconciling work and power of the cross (see more on this in The Gospel in Black and White, published by IVP).
From theory to reality
The “mystery of Christ” that Paul unveils further along in Ephesians 3 is that a racially reconciled church reveals the “manifold wisdom of God” to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly places. It also, therefore, reveals God’s manifold wisdom and power to the watching world. If our chapters are not revealing this “mystery of Christ” to our campuses, then our witness as a community is lacking in God’s wisdom and power.
Why bother?
Why bother with all this on such a white campus? Because much oppression remains, even if it is hidden. For example, at Cal Poly only ten percent of the African-American and Latino-American students that begin school will stay through to graduation, while the overall retention rate for white students is more than 55 percent. Certainly, the playing field at Cal Poly is far from level and severely limits the opportunities of some students in their quest for an education. As a fellowship on campus we should be concerned, as Jesus is, that everyone who comes to Cal Poly has the same opportunity to graduate.
What can you do?
A word of caution: we must follow Jesus’ example in developing these friendships. They must arise not out of tokenism or reluctant obedience, but out of a heart humbled and broken by Jesus as we learn of the ways that racial and ethnic separation grieves him and prevents the full mystery of his gospel from being revealed to us and to the whole campus. We need to approach such friendships with deep humility and an awareness that we have much to learn about Jesus from those who are ethnically and culturally different from us.
Gender pain
We had many opportunities to learn about the brokenness just by hearing the stories of the women in our small group. One member was a senior engineering student. She has also been the environmental mitigation monitor for the new sports complex being built on campus. At the construction site she is not only the youngest one there by several years, but also the only woman. As the environmental mitigation monitor she had the authority to completely stop construction by uttering the word. But she is also weary from hearing almost weekly from others that she is “too pretty to be an engineer.” The struggles she faces as a woman, discovering that she can’t always pull herself up by her bootstraps, have led her to a deeper understanding of and empathy for the students of color and the issues they face daily on a predominantly Caucasian campus.
Hop on board!
|
|||
|
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —Todd Minturn serves on InterVarsity® staff at California Polytechnic State U.
Talk to us! Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this article for educational purposes provided this permission notice, and the copyright notice below are preserved on all copies. Not to be reprinted in any other publication without permission. © 1999 InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA. All rights reserved. Questions about the website? Contact the Webservant Member of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students
|