Discussion Guide for Marsden's Outrageous Idea of Christian Scholarship
Chapter 4: "What Difference Could It Possibly
Make?"
What is the thesis of Chapter 4?
"This chapter responds to some of the most significant
questions that are likely to be raised regarding the possibility
or advisability of developing identifiably Christian scholarship.
It also sketches some of the types of ways in which we should
expect Christian perspectives to have real impact" (59).
What are the common objections Marsden raises?
"The argument is that there are lots of academic topics
which Christian perspectives or in this case denominational
perspectives, do not seem to change substantially. Hence
it seems that we must be chasing a phantom" (60).
"Implications of the faith may sometimes have an important
bearing on their theories and interpretations.. Even mathematicians
or technical scientists will be able to point out some faith-related
considerations that have relevance to the foundational questions
affecting the frameworks of their disciplines or the applications
of their work" (61).
Are there additional objections you hear? What is the most
common objection you hear? What is your response? Are you satisfied
with your response? What are Marsden's responses? Do you find
the responses compelling? Why or why not?
Is there one Christian perspective? What should be included
in "mere Christianity"?
What are the various ways to integrate?
|
