InterVarsity Logo InterVarsity Menu
Banner
spacer GFM Home
Features
Events
Most Emailed
Archives
About GFM
Grad Chapters



faculty home
Features
The Lamp Post
Events
Archives
Newsletter Archives
About Us
Contact Us
Donate

Ministries
Faculty
ESN
PSM
Law
MBA
RTSF
The Well
BSAP

Search GFM

spacer
line
spacer
Criteria for Faculty

by Frederick P. Brooks Jr.

Dr. Brooks notes, "Among my responsibilities are the recommendations and appointment of faculty. Here is a set of questions I find useful in assessing a person. Perhaps these lists will stimulate you to make your own, according to what you consider most important."

Among my responsibilities are the recommendations and appointment of faculty. Here is a set of questions I find useful in assessing a person. Perhaps these lists will stimulate you to make your own, according to what you consider most important.

Teaching

  1. Is their teaching respected by students?

  2. Are their courses substantial, following agreed-upon syllabi rather than idiosyncratic preferences?

  3. Do they prepare conscientiously?

  4. Do they treat students with respect, avoiding put-downs?

  5. Do they honestly say, "I don't know"?

  6. Do they like to teach? Like students?

  7. Do they pick good dissertation problems-big enough, not too big, accessible, timely, significant?

  8. Do they offer steady encouragement and supervision?

  9. Would you want your child to be their Ph.D. student?

  10. Would you want your child to take them as a role model?

Research

  1. Is their research fundamental in the questions it addresses?

  2. Is it ingenious in technique and/or viewpoint?

  3. Is it profound in its results and insights?

  4. Are all claims accurate, bounded, and modest?

  5. Do they give proper credit both to teammates and to sources of ideas?

  6. Are they a careful steward of research resources?

  7. Has their diligence continued undiminished after tenure?

Colleague Relations

  1. Are they respected by their colleagues? Liked?

  2. Do they gladly do their share of the committee chores, etc.?

  3. Do they interact or collaborate much with their colleagues?

  4. Do they help achieve department objectives, such as supporting able students, with their research money?

  5. Do they have too high an opinion of themselves?

  6. Are they personally insecure?

  7. Do they treat juniors, secretaries, with courtesy?

Here is a stricter checklist for us who are Christians.

Teaching

  1. Loves their students.

  2. Structures their courses to maximize learning experiences for the students, not the lecturing joys of the teacher.

  3. Illuminates their discipline with a Christian worldview.

  4. Sympathetically presents various viewpoints on controversial issues.

  5. Makes their position unambiguous, but labeled as their own.

  6. Hopes for all students to succeed in examinations, but does not lower standards.

  7. Resists fads, all itching for what is new.

  8. Carefully avoids "intellectual cloning," replicating themselves in their students, especially their doctoral "children."

Research

  1. Does all ad gloriam Dei, not for the praise of colleagues.

  2. Sees their discipline in eternal perspective.

  3. Depends on God for professional guidance.

  4. Chooses problems prayerfully, considering their usefulness.

  5. Is teachable by previous workers, uses their references.

  6. Rejoices in discoveries, insights, and accomplishments equally, whether made by themselves or a competitor.

  7. Shares interim results and ideas. Welcomes rivals/visits.

  8. Accepts correction gladly, gives it gently.

  9. Takes no offense when others don't reference his work.

  10. Is charitable when reviewers are petty or inaccurate.

Role Model

  1. Is not ashamed of Christ.

  2. Lives a life disciplined with respect to food, drink, sleep, exercise, time-use and work.

  3. Lives a godly family life.

  4. Maintains a disciplined and modest standard of living.

  5. Is active in Christian fellowship.

  6. Offers volunteer service to salt society.

  7. Is available for pastoral care within their discipline.

  8. Is willing to offer painful reproof to colleagues and students with errant lives.

  9. Is obedient to those in authority and avoids speaking evil of rulers, even in their institution.

  10. Asks forgiveness freely and settles differences with others.

Frederick P. Brooks Jr. is Kenan Professor of Computer Science at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.




Comments:

(hide)

There are none, you can be the first!

Discuss this resource
  1.  (required)
  2.  (required, but never published)
  3.  (optional)
also about Academic Vocation

  Resources
 
How Can We Change the University?
C. John Sommerville expounds on the assertion that now is a time of opportunity for Christians in the university, introduced in his book Decline of the Secular University, to tell us how we must now embark on changing the academic world.
 
Leading a Balanced Life of Excellence
What good is it if we gain academic prestige, yet forfeit our souls? Robert Kaita, Princeton Physicist, offers his perspective and a Scriptural basis for aiming to serve Christ and achieve academic success simultaneously.
 
What is Calling?
Marc Baer of Hope College addresses conceptions (and misconceptions) of calling from personal, Biblical, and historical perspectives. Can we know our calling?
» view other Academic Vocation resources

  Events
 
 
2010 Midwest Faculty Conference
 
2010 West Coast Faculty Conference

SEARCH
Powered
by
FILED UNDER
»   Academic Vocation
»   Spiritual Formation

TOOLS


 

 

spacer
© 2009 InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA ®  |  Privacy Policy
Questions about the website? Contact Contact the webservant
Member of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students
Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability
InterVarsity Store Search the Site Contact Us All InterVarsity Ministries Banner